Added by Stats. 2001, Ch. 816, Sec. 3. Effective January 1, 2002.
This part may be cited as the Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act.
Part 5 - UNIFORM INTERSTATE ENFORCEMENT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROTECTION ORDERS ACT
California Family Code — §§ 6400-6409
Sections (10)
Amended by Stats. 2003, Ch. 134, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2004.
In this part:
(1)“Foreign protection order” means a protection order issued by a tribunal of another state.
(2)“Issuing state” means the state whose tribunal issues a protection order.
(3)“Mutual foreign protection order” means a foreign protection order that includes provisions in favor of both the protected individual seeking enforcement of the order and the respondent.
(4)“Protected individual” means an individual protected by a protection order.
(5)“Protection order” means an injunction or other order, issued by a tribunal under the domestic violence, family violence, or antistalking laws of the issuing state, to prevent an individual from engaging in violent or threatening acts against, harassment of, contact or communication with, or physical proximity to, another individual.
(6)“Respondent” means the
individual against whom enforcement of a protection order is sought.
(7)“State” means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. The term includes an Indian tribe or band, or any branch of the United States military, that has jurisdiction to issue protection orders.
(8)“Tribunal” means a court, agency, or other entity authorized by law to issue or modify a protection order.
Amended by Stats. 2003, Ch. 134, Sec. 2. Effective January 1, 2004.
(a)A person authorized by the law of this state to seek enforcement of a protection order may seek enforcement of a valid foreign protection order in a tribunal of this state. The tribunal shall enforce the terms of the order, including terms that provide relief that a tribunal of this state would lack power to provide but for this section. The tribunal shall enforce the order, whether the order was obtained by independent action or in another proceeding, if it is an order issued in response to a complaint, petition, or motion filed by or on behalf of an individual seeking protection. In a proceeding to enforce a foreign protection order, the tribunal shall follow the procedures of this state for the enforcement of protection orders.
(b)A tribunal of this state may not enforce a foreign protection order issued by a tribunal of a state that does not recognize the standing of a protected individual to seek enforcement of the order.
(c)A tribunal of this state shall enforce the provisions of a valid foreign protection order which govern custody and visitation, if the order was issued in accordance with the jurisdictional requirements governing the issuance of custody and visitation orders in the issuing state.
(d)A foreign protection order is valid if it meets all of the following criteria:
(1)Identifies the protected individual and the respondent.
(2)Is currently in effect.
(3)Was issued by a tribunal that had jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter under the law of the issuing state.
(4)Was issued after the respondent was given reasonable notice and had an opportunity to be heard before the tribunal issued the order or, in the case of an order ex parte, the respondent was given notice and has had or will have an opportunity to be heard within a
reasonable time after the order was issued, in a manner consistent with the rights of the respondent to due process.
(e)A foreign protection order valid on its face is prima facie evidence of its validity.
(f)Absence of any of the criteria for validity of a foreign protection order is an affirmative defense in an action seeking enforcement of the order.
(g)A tribunal of this state may enforce provisions of a mutual foreign protection order which favor a respondent only if both of the following are true:
(1)The respondent filed a written pleading seeking a protection order from the tribunal of the issuing state.
(2)The tribunal of the issuing state made specific findings in favor of the respondent.
Added by Stats. 2001, Ch. 816, Sec. 3. Effective January 1, 2002.
(a)A law enforcement officer of this state, upon determining that there is probable cause to believe that a valid foreign protection order exists and that the order has been violated, shall enforce the order as if it were the order of a tribunal of this state. Presentation of a protection order that identifies both the protected individual and the respondent and, on its face, is currently in effect constitutes, in and of itself, probable cause to believe that a valid foreign protection order exists. For the purposes of this section, the protection order may be inscribed on a tangible medium or may have been stored in an electronic or other medium if it is retrievable in perceivable form. Presentation of a certified copy of a protection order is not required for enforcement.
(b)If a foreign protection order is not presented, a law enforcement officer of this state may consider other information in determining whether there is probable cause
to believe that a valid foreign protection order exists.
(c)If a law enforcement officer of this state determines that an otherwise valid foreign protection order cannot be enforced because the respondent has not been notified or served with the order, the officer shall inform the respondent of the order, make a reasonable effort to serve the order upon the respondent, and allow the respondent a reasonable opportunity to comply with the order before enforcing the order. Verbal notice of the terms of the order is sufficient notice for the purposes of this section.
(d)Registration or filing of an order in this state is not required for the enforcement of a valid foreign protection order pursuant to this part.
Amended by Stats. 2019, Ch. 115, Sec. 72. (AB 1817) Effective January 1, 2020.
(a)A foreign protection order shall, upon request of the person in possession of the order, be registered with a court of this state in order to be entered in the California Restraining and Protective Order System established under Section 6380. The Judicial Council shall adopt rules of court to do the following:
(1)Set forth the process whereby a person in possession of a foreign protection order may voluntarily register the order with a court of this state for entry into the California Restraining and Protective Order System.
(2)Require the sealing of foreign protection orders and provide access
only to law enforcement, the person who registered the order upon written request with proof of identification, the defense after arraignment on criminal charges involving an alleged violation of the order, or upon further order of the court.
(b)A fee shall not be charged for the registration of a foreign protection order. The court clerk shall provide all Judicial Council forms required by this part to a person in possession of a foreign protection order free of charge.
Amended by Stats. 2013, Ch. 263, Sec. 3. (AB 176) Effective January 1, 2014. Operative July 1, 2014, by Sec. 5 of Ch. 263.
(a)There shall be no civil liability on the part of, and no cause of action for false arrest or false imprisonment against, a peace officer who makes an arrest pursuant to a foreign protection order that is regular upon its face, if the peace officer, in making the arrest, acts in good faith and has reasonable cause to believe that the person against whom the order is issued has notice of the order and has committed an act in violation of the order.
(b)If there is more than one order issued and one of the orders is an emergency protective order that has precedence in enforcement pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of Section 136.2 of the Penal Code, the peace officer shall enforce the emergency protective order. If there is more than one order issued, none of the orders issued is an emergency protective order that has precedence in enforcement, and one of the orders issued is a no-contact order, as described in Section 6320, the peace officer shall
enforce the no-contact order. If there is more than one civil order regarding the same parties and neither an emergency protective order that has precedence in enforcement nor a no-contact order has been issued, the peace officer shall enforce the order that was issued last. If there are both civil and criminal orders regarding the same parties and
neither an emergency protective order that has precedence in enforcement nor a no-contact order has been issued, the peace officer shall enforce the criminal order issued last.
(c)Nothing in this section shall be deemed to exonerate a peace officer from liability for the unreasonable use of force in the enforcement of the order. The immunities afforded by this section shall not affect the
availability of any other immunity that may apply, including, but not limited to, Sections 820.2 and 820.4 of the Government Code.
Added by Stats. 2001, Ch. 816, Sec. 3. Effective January 1, 2002.
A protected individual who pursues remedies under this part is not precluded from pursuing other legal or equitable remedies against the respondent.
Added by Stats. 2001, Ch. 816, Sec. 3. Effective January 1, 2002.
In applying and construing this part, consideration shall be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that also have adopted the act cited in Section 6400.
Added by Stats. 2001, Ch. 816, Sec. 3. Effective January 1, 2002.
If any provision of this part or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of this part which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this part are severable.
Added by Stats. 2001, Ch. 816, Sec. 3. Effective January 1, 2002.
This part applies to protection orders issued before January 1, 2002, and to continuing actions for enforcement of foreign protection orders commenced before January 1, 2002. A request for enforcement of a foreign protection order made on or after January 1, 2002, for violations of a foreign protection order occurring before January 1, 2002, is governed by this part.